Delaware and Georgia Supreme Courts Issue New Guidelines on Generative AI Use in the Judiciary

Delaware and Georgia Supreme Courts Issue New Guidelines on Generative AI Use in the Judiciary

According to a LawSites article by Bob Ambrogi, the supreme courts of Delaware and Georgia have issued new guidelines on generative AI (GenAI) in the judicial system, reflecting a growing need to address AI use in legal settings.

On October 21, the Delaware Supreme Court adopted an interim policy that guides judicial officers and court staff on GenAI use. Developed by the Delaware Commission on Law and Technology, this policy sets clear guidelines: users are responsible for ensuring the accuracy of GenAI outputs, must be informed about the technology, and may not rely on GenAI for decision-making. GenAI must also comply with relevant laws and policies, and only approved GenAI tools may be used, particularly when handling non-public information.

The following day, Georgia’s Supreme Court appointed members to an Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts, established in August. This 16-member committee—primarily composed of judges and court officials—aims to evaluate GenAI’s potential benefits and risks within the judiciary and ensure AI does not compromise public trust in the judicial system. The committee convened for its first meeting on October 23.

Both states highlight a cautious, regulated approach to GenAI, underscoring the importance of user responsibility, data privacy, and public confidence in judicial processes. These developments signal that courts are beginning to adapt to AI technologies while prioritizing oversight and trust.